Pastoral Musings

Thoughts, essays, and miscellanea…

Archive for the 'Fundamentals' Category

Creation And Knowledge

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 20th February 2013

Cornelius Van Til

Cornelius Van Til (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

“If the Christian position with respect to creation, that is, with respect to the idea of the origin of both the subject and the object of human knowledge is true, there is and must be objective knowledge. In that case the world of objects was made in order that the subject of knowledge, namely man, should interpret it under God. Without the interpretation of the universe by man to the glory of God the whole world would be meaningless. The subject and object are therefore adapted to one another. On the other hand if the Christian theory of creation by God is not true then we hold that there cannot be objective knowledge of anything. In that case all things in this universe are unrelated and cannot be in fruitful contact with one another. This we believe to be the simple alternative on the question of the objectivity of knowledge as far as the things of this universe are concerned.”

 Cornelius Van Til, The Defense Of The Faith, P&R, Philadelphia, PA, pg 43

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , ,
Posted in creation, Fundamentals, Genesis, hermeneutics | 4 Comments »

A Literal Creation, A Literal Fall, And Literal Redemption

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 20th February 2013

In the past week I’ve learned of two guys whose life ended in what we would call a premature manner. One was forty-two years of age and died suddenly. The other was twenty-six years of age and he, too, died suddenly.

These things shock us.

We don’t expect those things to happen.

We understand deep within that these things shouldn’t happen- they simply are abnormalities.

Why?

Because we understand deep down inside that this is not how the world is supposed to be.

Now if the world truly evolved, or if God somehow used evolution to create (which to me seems to be a contradictory use of terms), then these things would be normal and expected. We would realize that it is simply how things are. We would probably even evolve a method/organ with which to deal with these things. We would then accept them easily and move on with life.

But we don’t do that.

We don’t do that because we cannot.

We don’t do that because death will never be normal, though it is understood that it happens.

We battle against death.

We fight it.

We hate it.

We try to avoid it.

We weep, we ache, we cry, we scream, we get angry when we lose someone to death.

This is only understandable in the light of the fact that God gave us a perfect creation just as Genesis 1-2 tell us.

This is understandable in light of the fact that death is an anomaly and not part of creation.

This is also understandable in light of the fact that death results from the fall of man, and so does the accompanying heartache.

We have hope because we read of a literal redemption that is available in Christ.

We have hope because we read of a time when Christ restores Paradise to man, or man to Paradise.

We have hope because we read of a time when death is finally and forever abolished.

Once one begins to deny a literal historical narrative of creation in Genesis 1-2, he logically must deny the literal nature of the reversal of the fall and the return to Paradise.

Redemption is then a fallacy.

It is only a dream.

Christianity is then only an opiate for the uneducated, or those who are in denial.

This is not a slippery slope argument. It is about following the foolish logic of those who deny that the Creation Narrative is truly a literal historical narrative to its end.

Do these professing Christians truly wish to deny hope and peace to grieving people? In the end they are denying it by laying the foundation for the rejection of redemption and restoration. They may not deny these things, but the foundation is laid. It will not be long until there are those who will follow them and their logic to its logical conclusion.

As for me, I shall cling to Scripture and cling to hope in Christ. That is the only way that I can offer hope to others.

If that sounds pragmatic; pardon  me, please. There is simply no reason or no hope in an uncreated world, and I have no desire to embrace irrationality and despair. I also refuse to subject those dear people who are in my care to hopelessness.

I choose to embrace a literal reading of the Genesis Creation Narrative because I embrace rationality and hope.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , ,
Posted in creation, depravity, Fundamentals, Genesis, hermeneutics | 9 Comments »

Jesus The Truth

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 7th January 2013

John 14:6 is a very well known statement by Jesus in which He declares Himself to be the truth.

This statement can best be understood in the opening verses of John where he testifies that Jesus is God, Creator, and life (John 1:1-4). Coupled with John 1:14, where we see that Jesus is full of truth, and John 1:17, where we see that Jesus brought truth, we can see that there is no truth apart from Jesus.

Now let’s look at this for just a moment and reflect upon this. Jesus is the Creator. Jesus is the truth. Nothing was made without Him, and there is no truth apart from Him.

The epistemological implications are profound, yet can be stated quite simply.

Since Jesus is both the origin of truth and the Creator, we must reject any evolutionary framework: even theistic evolution. The reason is that truth originates with Jesus. An evolutionary framework shows God working through trial and error until He gets it somewhat right. That makes the truth something independent of God- something that God must seek and find. Thus God is not the author of truth and is not the truth.

If any form of evolutionary theory is true, then God is not the truth and there is no absolute truth. All is irrational.

Either Jesus our Creator is the Truth, or there is no truth.

There is no middle ground.

There cannot be.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , ,
Posted in apologetics, creation, Fundamentals, Genesis | Comments Off

They Called Jesus A Blasphemer, Too.

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 1st January 2013

For the last year or so I have refused to take the bait from Joel and folk of his kind.

I simply haven’t the time for foolishness, straw men, liberalism, and the desire to misconstrue the things that are said by those with whom he disagrees.

Today, however, he decided to call me a blasphemer. Oh, he didn’t use that word directly: he just said that my words about Genesis were blasphemous. That is essentially the same as calling me a blasphemer.

The problem is that Joel willingly refuses to see that Jesus is the Creator (John 1:1-3; Colossians 1:15-19,Hebrews 1:1-4  etc.) When one speaks of God’s act of Creation, one speaks of Jesus creating.

Far from denying the centrality of Jesus, I emphasize it. It is also the reason I will not compromise with unbiblical and irrational worldviews that deny that inherent and eternal authority of Christ as He is revealed to us in Scripture.

Instead of denying the centrality of Jesus, my beliefs concerning Jesus give Him His proper place not only as Creator, but as the autonomous God who reveals Himself to us in His Word (Scripture). That is very different from trying to be autonomous and declare that Scripture must conform to the irrationalism of the present age that seeks to deny that truth of Scripture.

When Jesus spoke of His exalted being He was called a blasphemer. I’m glad to know that, as imperfect as I am, that my exaltation of Jesus puts me in good company.

So, Joel, continue on the path you take if you wish. I want no part of it. I have no respect for it. I pity you for your lack of faith as well as the lack of character that leads you to willfully show disrespect with no good cause. I shall continue to pray for you, but I have no more time for your foolish denial of the truth of Scripture.

Tags: ,
Posted in apologetics, Bible, creation, Fundamentals, Genesis, hermeneutics, higher criticism, Old Testament | 5 Comments »

Scripture and Words

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 8th August 2012

“In Scripture there are no throwaway lines.”
C.J Mahaney
here

Tags: ,
Posted in Bible, Fundamentals, Inerrancy, Preaching | Comments Off

Warfield On How To Deal With Alleged Discrepancies In Scripture

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 12th May 2012

Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield (1851-1921)

Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield (1851-1921) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

…it is a reasonable principle, recognized among critics of secular historians, that two writers must not be held to be contradictory where any natural mode of harmonizing can be imagined. Otherwise it amounts to holding that we know fully and thoroughly all facts of the case, – better even than eye-witnesses seem ever to know them.

Warfield, Works vol 1 pg 417

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: ,
Posted in Bible, Fundamentals, Inerrancy, liberalism, Scripture | Comments Off

A Liberal’s Admission That Fundamentalists Are More Biblical

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 2nd May 2012

Liberal says that those who don’t admit that are not well informed of historical theology.

 

 

I am sorry for the fate of anyone who tries to argue with a fundamentalist on the basis of authority. The Bible and the corpus theologicum of the Church is on the Fundamentalist side.

via Hip and Thigh: Fundamentals and the Bible.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Fundamentals, liberalism | Comments Off

Warfield On The Incarnational Model Of The Scriptures

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 18th April 2012

It seems to be a fad today to say that Jesus was not only God, but man. Somehow or another this is supposed to mean that Jesus could have been mistaken on a few things, and so Scripture could be mistaken on a few things due to Scripture being from God through man.

This is actually an old error in new packaging, as most heresies are. B.B. Warfield spoke concerning this saying,

It has been customary among a certain school of writers to speak of the Scriptures,

Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield (1851-1921)

Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield (1851-1921) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

because thus “inspired,” as a Divine-human book, and to appeal to the analogy of

Our Lord’s Divine-human personality to explain their peculiar qualities as such. The

expression calls attention to an important fact, and the analogy holds good a certain

distance. There are human and Divine sides to Scripture, and, as we cursorily

examine it, we may perceive in it, alternately, traits which suggest now the one, now

the other factor in its origin. But the analogy with Our Lord’s Divine-human

personality may easily be pressed beyond reason. There is no hypostatic union

between the Divine and the human in Scripture; we cannot parallel the

“inscripturation” of the Holy Spirit and the incarnation of the Son of God. The

Scriptures are merely the product of Divine and human forces working together to

produce a product in the production of which the human forces work under the

initiation and prevalent direction of the Divine: the person of Our Lord unites in itself

Divine and human natures, each of which retains its distinctness while operating only

in relation to the other. Between such diverse things there can exist only a remote

analogy; and, in point of fact, the analogy in the present instance amounts to no more

than that in both cases Divine and human factors are involved, though very

differently. In the one they unite to constitute a Divine-human person, in the other

they coöperate to perform a Divine-human work. Even so distant an analogy may

enable us, however, to recognize that as, in the case of Our Lord’s person, the

human nature remains truly human while yet it can never fall into sin or error because

it can never act out of relation with the Divine nature into conjunction with which it

has been brought; so in the case of the production of Scripture by the conjoint action

of human and Divine factors, the human factors have acted as human factors, and

have left their mark on the product as such, and yet cannot have fallen into that error

which we say it is human to fall into, because they have not acted apart from the

Divine factors, by themselves, but only under their unerring guidance.

Revelation and InspirationVolume 1, pg 81; Benjamin B. Warfield. COPYRIGHT, © 2003, BY DIGITAL PUBLICATIONS, DALLAS, TEXAS, USA

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: ,
Posted in Fundamentals, Genesis, hermeneutics, Inerrancy, liberalism, Scripture | Comments Off

Learning from Liberals

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 14th April 2012

Let us not totally dismiss the liberals. We can learn from them. Nate Busenitz gives us several ways in which we can learn from liberals. Number seven is especially worth noting.

 

Higher criticism, in particular, is built on the notion that the wisdom of man trumps the revealed wisdom of God. This is the height of arrogance. But it is not surprising, since Paul himself noted that the wisdom of God seems like foolishness to the world (1 Cor. 1:18). We must guard ourselves against the temptation to covet worldly praise and academic accolade. To be faithful to the gospel, we will necessarily be thought out-of-vogue with many of today’s leading philosophical thinkers. While we must avoid anti-intellectualism on the one hand, we must also guard ourselves against the allure of whatever is popular in the secular academic community.

via Learning from Liberals | The Cripplegate.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in doctrine, Fundamentals, liberalism | Comments Off

Inerrancy: Practical And Pastoral Concerns

Posted by Pastoral Musings on 27th February 2012

 

Inerrancy: Why Is It Important?

Words of Christ - 6/52

Words of Christ - 6/52 (Photo credit: Roger's Wife)

Why is it important that we affirm and embrace the doctrine of the infallibility and inerrancy of Scripture? This is a very important issue to me as a pastor. It is greatly relevant to my ministry and the people for whom I am responsible.

The first thing that we need to recognize is the relevance of the truthfulness of Scripture to the truthfulness of God. If Scripture is God’s Word, and we have seen that is what Scripture claims to be, either God has spoken truly or He has not spoken truly. Is God true? Does God speak the truth without error? If God speaks the truth, then we can have confidence that Scripture is true and without error. If not, how great are the implications for God’s people! To have a God who does not speak the truth, or is unable to communicate truth without error is certainly a diminishing of the person of God.

When we consider the fact that Scripture presents itself to us as sufficient for the growth of God’s people, we understand that God’s people need to read and understand the Scriptures. If, as some claim, Scripture presents us truth about God but not about other things such as history, we are left with a book that is somewhat confusing. Scriptures does not give us redemptive truth apart from a historical setting. Scripture was given in real life settings to real people. When God gave us Scripture, He spoke through men who were men of their times. They spoke about God as He interacted with them in their lives. They did not speak of God abstractly, as many theologians speak of Him. They spoke of God as acting in history and doing things that science often says cannot be done. If there are historical and scientific errors in the Scriptures, we must somehow find a way to sift through the error and get to the truth. That would be most discouraging to many people who have no training in history and science. It would create an intellectual priesthood of academics who would be necessary to explain the Scriptures to the common man. That was not, and is not, God’s intent for Scripture. God intends for the Scriptures to be understood by His people. God spoke through common men in a specific time to common men in all times in language that common men can understand. Though the understanding of the common man (And I should also say that of the academics.) is not full, it is sufficient for the purpose of God in Scripture to be fulfilled. God’s people will be transformed as they read, understand, and trust Him as He is revealed in Scripture. Only as we understand Scripture to be true and without error will we arrive at this conclusion.

Once we begin to assert that Scripture errs, we will also come to the point to assert that Jesus erred. There is an indissoluble connection between Christ and the Scriptures. Once admit error into Scripture, Jesus will be admitted as erring. Again, the implications are great. Though we admit the full humanity of Christ, we also embrace His Divinity. Jesus Christ is as truly God as He is human. God does not lie, does not err, and speaks truly in all things. What kind of Savior do we preach to the people? Because truth is more than an issue of correct facts, but is a moral issue as well, we must understand that the admission of error into Scripture will also admit the possibility that they are morally wrong. If we do that, we must also admit that Jesus may very well have been (or at the present, be) morally wrong. That may be very well for those who have so deeply compromised with a secular worldview, but for those of us whose presupposition is that of the truthfulness of Scripture, it will never work. Neither will we embrace a Savior who cannot save, because He is in the same predicament as we are. We embrace the truthfulness of Scripture and the perfection of Jesus our Savior, and we reject anything that compromises these things and diminishes the glory of Christ.

Because faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God (Romans 10:17;2Timothy 3:14-15), we understand that we are to believe the Scriptures. An errant Bible is an untrustworthy Bible. An errant Scripture means that we have an untrustworthy God. An errant Bible means that we have a Christ who is not trustworthy. God is either not true, or unable to speak truth to us in a perfect manner. That means that we cannot trust God’s words and, logically, cannot trust Him. That means that we cannot trust Jesus to speak the complete truth without error and, logically, cannot trust Him. Though we trust men who often fail to speak the complete truth, God has told us that He does not err and does not lie. If we admit error into the Scriptures, we also admit that God errs and does not always speak truthfully. Truthfulness being a moral quality, we find that our ability to trust God, and God as revealed in His incarnate Son, is greatly diminished.

We must also consider the fact that Scripture is given to us for our holiness. We are sanctified by the work of the Word of God (Ephesians 5:25-28;2Timothy 3:16-17). I am not alone in being a pastor who ministers to sinful people on a regular basis. I am also a person who struggles with sin, because I am no different from any other person. What we need is something to change us. God’s Word promises to be used of God to be the instrument that changes us. If I am unsure of the truthfulness of God’s Word, I will not be very trusting of God’s Word and will not submit myself to the sanctifying power of God’s Word as I should. My people and I need a full faith in the Word of God so that our lives will be changed by God. We struggle with sinful habits, sinful thoughts, addictions, immorality, and ungodliness. We need to be able to trust God’s Word and His power to use the Scriptures to sanctify us.

Scripture is given to us for a very practical purpose. Scripture is given to us to lead us to salvation through faith in Jesus Christ and to guide us as we are being transformed into holy people who are pleasing to God. As a pastor, I have great faith that God will use His Word to accomplish His purposes. The reason that I have this faith is that I have faith in God’s trustworthy character, and I have faith in God’s speaking truthfully to us in His Word. As I stand in the pulpit, minister in homes, or wherever I may be, I am convinced that God’s Word is without error and will always direct us correctly. Though we may fail in our interpretations at times, God never fails to tell us exactly what we need in His Word. I am confident that the way of salvation is truthfully presented to us in Scripture. I am confident that the way of holiness is inerrantly presented to us in God’s Word. I am thankful that God’s Word can be trusted as the truth so that we can have confidence in God and His power to save and sanctify.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: ,
Posted in Bible, Fundamentals, Inerrancy, liberalism, Scripture | 2 Comments »

 

Switch to our mobile site