My response to the above being present as an inconsistency is to wonder why anyone would think that it is one.
All three have two names in common. In two of them there is a third common name that actually is in the third as well, but in a variant form.
Finally, for purposes unknown to us at this moment some (or even all) of the writers chose not to include every descendant in their lists.
I simply must wonder what is inconsistent with an incomplete genealogy? There is no conflict between the three.