Pastoral Musings

Thoughts, devotions, book reviews, and miscellanea from the pastor….

Book Review: The Meaning of The Pentateuch by John Sailhamer

Posted by JasonS on February 1, 2010

The Meaning of the Pentateuch: Revelation, Composition and InterpretationThe Meaning of the Pentateuch: Revelation, Composition and Interpretation by John H. Sailhamer

My rating: 5 of 5 stars
What can be said about John H. Sailhamer? He is professor of Old Testament at Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary in Brea, CA, an author of several books, and a very intelligent man.
The Meaning of The Pentateuch covers the gamut of Biblical studies. Not only does it deal with the meaning of the Pentateuch, but it also gives a crash course in hermeneutics, Biblical theology, Old Testament theology, as well as interacting with covenant theology and dispensationalism. Considering this, it is no wonder that the book is over six hundred pages!
Written from an evangelical perspective that seems to be pretty conservative, The Meaning of The Pentateuch addresses the issues surrounding the revelation, composition, and interpretation of the Pentateuch. This was no doubt a daunting undertaking, but the result is pleasing. Sailhamer is convinced that the Pentateuch was composed in its present state to present theological truth. He shows how various Biblical themes are arranged, organized, and presented throughout the whole of the Pentateuch. I was amazed to see this, because I learned so very many things that I had never known. This book has been extensively highlighted by me, and will be one to which I shall refer quite often when studying.
In the end, Sailhamer essentially tells us that we should recognize that the Old Testament should be allowed to stand on its own instead of reading the New Testament back into it. The Pentateuch shows a much more detailed understanding of the coming Christ than most of us realize. Sailhamer brings this to the fore in this book. In doing so he has done a great service to the church.
The reader should not allow the length and size of the book to deter him. It is a book worth reading and re-reading. It is destined to be a classic in Old Testament studies.
Thanks to Adrianna Wright of IVP for this review copy.

View all my reviews >>

Posted in book reviews | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Book Review: Pure Pleasure by Gary Thomas

Posted by JasonS on February 8, 2010

Pure Pleasure: Why Do Christians Feel So Bad about Feeling Good?Pure Pleasure: Why Do Christians Feel So Bad about Feeling Good? by Gary L. Thomas

My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Pure Pleasure by Gary Thomas
I’ve known that Gary Thomas was out there writing books, but this is the first book of his that I have read. That being said, I enjoyed Pure Pleasure.
Thomas has a way of writing that is easy on the reader. His writing is simple and down-to-earth. I like that. He is also a transparent writer. We are not left wondering what he thinks, nor whether he struggles as we do: he speaks openly and honestly on these subjects.
Thomas deals with the question that has plagued many Christians for centuries- the issue of pleasure. Many have declared pleasure to be sinful. Others have become antinomians and declared that nothing is off limits. Thomas declares both ideas to be wrong and unbiblical. In fact, in the same vein of thought as Desiring God, Thomas declares pleasure to be good, and to be our duty.
We do NOT have to feel guilty because we enjoy something. Why, then, do many Christians feel bad when they feel good? Simply because we have misunderstood our Bibles and what they say about pleasure.
Not only does Thomas show us that things we naturally enjoy (sex, food, family,etc) can be enjoyed in a way that pleases God, he also shows us how that misplaced pleasure is dangerous. What is just as necessary to us is his chapter on finding pleasure even when things are difficult.
All in all, Pure Pleasure is a message that we need to hear today.

View all my reviews >>

Posted in book reviews | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Book Review: Sense And Sensibility by Jane Austen: Bethany House Edition

Posted by JasonS on February 6, 2010

Sense and SensibilitySense and Sensibility by Jane Austen

My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Sense And Sensibility by Jane Austen
What can be said about a classic? Much, I believe.
Austen wrote a book that is very instructive in how people face life and love. Set in a time when many seemed to thrive on that which was deemed genteel and appropriate, but were very superficial, Sense And Sensibility shows the manner in which two (There were several others, but the Dashwood sisters are the two main characters.) sisters dealt with love. Elinor was prudent, careful, and thoughtful (She used sense). Marianne was passionate (Sensibile is the way Austen described her.). They both fell in love, and both were hurt in different ways. In the end, both learned the value of having a balance between careful, well-thought out approaches to love, and a passionate approach to love.
The ins and outs of their loves are not too different from our times. Neither are the people. The great difference is in the setting. Human nature remains the same. We can learn much about life from this book.
Bethany House Publishers has done the reader a service by providing appropriate historical details, references to various movies based upon the book, and humorous comments along the way.
Who would have ever thought that reading a classic could be so much joy!?!

Thanks to the kind folk at Bethany House for this review copy.

View all my reviews >>

Posted in book reviews | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Genesis, Creation, And The Ancient Near East

Posted by JasonS on February 5, 2010

It seems that the going thing for many is to draw parallels between the Genesis Creation account and various myths from the ancient Near East.

I have not read much from the ancient Near East, but what I have read seems to be more dis-similar than similar.

Why the parallelism/parallelomania?  Are there truly parallels to be found that show these similarities, or is it a sort of wishful thinking on the part of those finding the parallels?

Posted in Genesis, apologetics, creation | Tagged: , , , | 9 Comments »

Does Biblical Literalism Truly Lead to A Mean Spirit?

Posted by JasonS on February 2, 2010

In an amazing article on PatrolMag.com Matthew Paul Turner tells of an experience he had while working for CCM magazine.

It seems that the manager of the periodical wanted to run an interview with Amy Grant in the magazine.  He also wanted to run the interview with an apology from Grant for having gone through a divorce.  He is stated to have stipulated that the article would not run without the apology.

The interviewer did not get the requisite apology and was called into his manager’s office and taken to task for not including an apology in the interview (Note: The article was run in a heavily edited/rewritten fashion with a fabricated apology). What caught my attention, however, was the portrayal of Gerald, the manager.

“..Gerald called me into his office. I considered putting on a bulletproof jacket, or at the very least, wearing a wire so somebody who liked me could eavesdrop on our conversation. It was very possible I might need saving. In my opinion, Gerald was the worst kind of bully—a gruff, condescending, loud, biblical literalist.”

I can see being “gruff, condescending, loud” as things that characterize a bully.  But why “biblical literalist”?  What does that have to do with being a bully of the worst kind? Nothing.  Nothing at all.

Why does a desire to understand the Bible literally have nothing to do with being a bully?  Because, as Kevin Vanhoozer says in Is There A Meaning In This Text, the literal sense is the literary sense.  So…..what does one taking poetry as poetry, narrative as narrative, history as history have to do with one being a bully?  I see no reason to believe that it does.

Turner’s statement is simply a classic case of one confusing a literal understanding of the Bible with a woodenly literal understanding of the Bible.  Wooden literalism doesn’t understand genre, figures of speech, idioms, etc.  Biblical literalism does know the difference and appreciates those differences.

Anyone can be a bully.  Being a bully and being mean spirited aren’t monopolized by people with a literal hermeneutic.  Atheists, agnostics, liberals, conservatives, ad infinitum can be bullies.

What makes a person a bully, then?  Sin.  Inherent depravity.  That makes a bully.   A literal hermeneutic does not a bully make.

Posted in Bible, hermeneutics | Tagged: , , , , | 9 Comments »

Presuppositions For Theological Study

Posted by JasonS on January 30, 2010

Presuppositions for Studying Theology

Many today approach the Bible in an academic fashion. Sadly, that is all the study of the Bible is for some: and academic pursuit. This is not sufficient, however. One needs to have salvation and then grow in grace. Theological studies should serve no other purpose than to give glory to God by Christ Jesus.

For one who studies theology there must be certain presuppositions. A presupposition is something that we assume beforehand. That is, a presupposition is a belief that we hold before we begin to give serious consideration to something. For theology, there should be certain presuppositions. They are as follows:

1.The inspiration and authority of Scripture:

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. ” (2 Timothy 3:16–17, KJV)

“For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty. For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. And this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him in the holy mount. We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. ” (2 Peter 1:16–21, KJV)

Scripture is of Divine, supernatural origin. It is authoritative. Scripture alone is our guide for serving God. Though we may learn from many sources, only Scripture gives to us the revelation of God that we need to trust and honor Him.

2.The infallibility of Scripture

“For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven. Thy faithfulness is unto all generations: thou hast established the earth, and it abideth. They continue this day according to thine ordinances: for all are thy servants. ” (Psalm 119:89–91, KJV)

“Thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and thy law is the truth. ” (Psalm 119:142, KJV)

“Concerning thy testimonies, I have known of old that thou hast founded them for ever. ” (Psalm 119:152, KJV)

“Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever. ” (Psalm 119:160, KJV)

“..the scripture cannot be broken; ” (John 10:35, KJV)

Scripture never fails. It is perfect and eternal in nature. The Word of God always accomplishes the purpose for which He gives it.

3.The sufficiency of Scripture

“Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar. ” (Proverbs 30:5–6, KJV)

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. ” (2 Timothy 3:16–17, KJV)

“For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. ” (Revelation 22:18–19, KJV)

The Holy Scriptures are sufficient for our spiritual growth. This does not discount the role of pastors, teachers, church, etc. The sufficiency of Scripture simply means that it contains all that we need to direct us in the paths of salvation, holiness, and godliness.

4.Faith in the One Who gave us Scripture

“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. ” (1 Corinthians 2:14, KJV)

“If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself. ” (John 7:17, KJV)

“Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. ” (John 8:31–32, KJV)

Only by trusting Christ and yielding to Him in faithful obedience may we truly learn of Him. Those who are born again have the Spirit of God dwelling in them and can truly understand that things of the Spirit of God. When we by faith obey God we learn the truthfulness of God’s Word and will and are made more and more free (gradual sanctification).

Posted in Bible, doctrine, theology | Tagged: , , | 6 Comments »