In The Beginning God

 

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)

 

 

 

 

Previously I looked at why Genesis was written (Note: I hope to edit and expand that post in the future.).

 

I also posted some thoughts about God’s nature as seen in the first verses of Genesis.

 

Note that Genesis gives us the reason for God by saying, “In the beginning God…”

 

One thing that we must understand is that there must be a cause for this world; because out of nothing, nothing comes. An infinite regress is a logical impossibility. That leaves us with the need for a beginning.

Everything begun, whether substance or phenomenon, owes its existence to some producing cause. The universe, at least so far as its present form is concerned, is a thing begun, and owes its existence to a cause which is equal to its production. This cause must be indefinitely great.

Augustus Hopkins Strong, Systematic Theology (Philadelphia: American Baptist Publication Society, 1907), 73.

 

Said beginning must transcend time, space, and matter. That beginning must be all knowing in intelligence and all powerful in wisdom and strength. After all, a body of water rises no higher than its source. So it is with the world; it shall be no more than its source, making its source infinitely greater than it is in knowledge, wisdom, power, and in every other attribute.

 

It might be helpful to illustrate the situation in this way. Imagine you are in the Alps, and from a high vantage point you can see three parallel ranges of mountains with two valleys in between. In one valley there is a lake, but the other is dry. Suddenly you begin to witness what sometimes happens in the Alps; a lake forming in the second valley where there was none before. As you see the water rising, you may wonder what its source is. If it stops at the same level as the lake in the neighboring valley, you may, after careful measurements, conclude that there is a possibility that the water has come from the first valley. But if your measurement shows that the level of the second lake is twenty feet higher than the first, then you can no longer consider that its source may be from the neighboring valley and you would have to seek another explanation. Personality is like that; no one has ever thought of a way of deriving personality from nonpersonal sources.

Therefore, biblical Christianity has an adequate and reasonable explanation for the source and meaning of human personality. Its source is sufficient—the personal God on the high order of Trinity. Without such a source men are left with personality coming from the impersonal (plus time, plus chance).

Francis A. Schaeffer, The Complete Works of Francis A. Schaeffer: a Christian Worldview, vol. 1 (Westchester, IL: Crossway Books, 1982), 94.

Once Christians understand that this is the same God who spoke of Himself as “I AM” (See Exodus 3:11-15), then we are getting somewhere.

 

Of course, we must also understand that this information given to us about God is also to be taken literally. We must not forget that, for God is not a figure of speech: He is both truly and literally the transcendent God of all Creation.

 

 

Note on infinite regress:

Alfarabi’s Cosmological Argument. Implied in this real distinction is an argument for God’s existence that takes this form:

1. Things exist whose essence is distinct from their existence. Called “possible beings,” they can be conceived as not existing even though they do exist.

2. These beings have existence only accidentally, that is, it is not part of their very essence to exist. It is logically possible that they might never exist.

3. Anything that has existence accidentally (and not essentially) must receive its existence from another. Since existence is not essential to it, there must be some explanation as to why it exists.

4. There cannot be an infinite regression of causes for existence. Since the existence of all possible beings is received from another, there must ultimately be a cause from which existence is received.

5. Therefore, there must be a First Cause of existence whose essence and existence are identical. This is a Necessary, and not a mere possible, Being. The First Cause cannot be a mere possible being (whose essence is not to exist), since no possible beings explain their own existence.

Geisler, Norman L. Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics. Baker Reference Library. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1999.

Audio Sermon: Jesus The Good Shepherd pt 1

Posted: 15th December 2014 by Pastoral Musings in audio sermons
Tags: , , ,


powered by podcast garden

 

click to download podcast episode

Genesis: Some Crucial Questions

 

  1. Is God real?
  2. Is God the source, Creator, and sovereign of all things?
  3. Can God fail to convey truth without error?
  4. Is God an ancient near eastern myth?
  5. Is God a literary device?
  6. Is God the Creator?
  7. Does the term “God” convey truth without being literally and infallibly true?
  8. Is God a figure of speech, or is God real?

 

These questions must be asked and answered by those who hypothesize about the Genesis Creation Account being poetry, myth, figurative, or simply a presentation of truth in a possibly errant fashion.

Sermon Audio: The LORD Is My Shepherd

Posted: 8th December 2014 by Pastoral Musings in audio sermons
Tags: , , , , ,


powered by podcast garden

 

click to download podcast episode

Sermon Audio: Victory Over Sin

Posted: 3rd December 2014 by Pastoral Musings in audio sermons
Tags: , , ,


powered by podcast garden

 

click to download podcast episode

1. Because the LORD God is the Creator. Christians don’t worship Marduk. (This is much more relevant than one might think it is.)

2. Because the true story of the creation would predate the ANE myths. Regardless of how it was transmitted, the true story of creation is older than the false stories. That is historically and logically necessary.

3. Simply because Proverbs may have some ANE proverbs within it doesn’t correspond to the story of the beginning having such in it. Why? Because the genre is different, and the goal of their writing is somewhat different.

4. The very nature of Scripture as God-breathed presents us with the understanding that God is the ultimate source of ALL of the truths in Scripture. This presents us with Scripture being the voice of God and infallible in nature. This certainly gives us reason to expect that there is an original creation account from which ALL others come. One is true, while the others cannot be true.

I trust that the Lord will bless me to unpack all of this in the future.

I wonder what it says about the minds of those who think that the Genesis Creation Account borrowed from ANE legends.

When we read this, it certainly shows no true comparison between the two.

I planned in my own heart, and there came into being a multitude of forms of beings, the forms of children and the forms of their children. I was the one who copulated with my fist, I masturbated (xxvii 1) with my hand. Then I spewed with my own mouth: I spat out what was Shu, and I sputtered out what was Tefnut. It was my father Nun who brought them up, and my Eye followed after them since the ages when they were distant from me.

Pritchard, James Bennett, ed. The Ancient Near East an Anthology of Texts and Pictures. 3rd ed. with Supplement. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969. pg 6

One thing is for sure, the God of Scripture isn’t presented in such a way.


powered by podcast garden

 

click to download podcast episode

Sermon Audio: Lord Of Laws / God’s Word And Law

Posted: 13th November 2014 by Pastoral Musings in audio sermons
Tags: , , , ,


powered by podcast garden

 

click to download podcast episode

Sermon Audio: Blind Made To See & Seeing Made Blind

Posted: 11th November 2014 by Pastoral Musings in audio sermons
Tags: , , , , ,


powered by podcast garden

 

click to download podcast episode